Every coaches regarding the data was indeed official Enneagram educators regarding Narrative Traditions. The fresh Enneagram Interval training Programmes put five pri type panels, (2) didactic studying, (3) reflection teaching, and you will (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Intense Courses educators implemented an outline called The latest Enneagram Intensive®: Partnering Psychological Lifetime and Heart.
The three Basic classes integrated pri studying strategies. The newest Berkeley direction incorporated relaxed Enneagram types of boards and you will didactic understanding. The fresh new Minnesota path made use of all four of your number 1 studying strategies. This new Palo Alto way made use of Enneagram particular boards, didactic reading, and you may experiential mining such as for example directed visualization.
Surveys was basically typed from the a report secretary and you can provided for an effective Cook-Greuter-specialized SCT scorer (Hy and you can Loevinger 1996) via blog post mail. Password quantity were utilized therefore the rater is blind to help you the type of one’s take to, this new dates of one’s take to, as well as the training group method of. This new scorer accompanied the training by the Susan Get ready-Greuter, by using the new Loevinger manual, apart from stems outside the guidelines (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored solutions had been sent back to the boffins from inside the a stick out give piece which had been upcoming used in research studies. To ensure accuracy of one’s scoring getting causes and therefore players went upwards or off several level, a sample of them training was also scored by the Cook-Greuter by herself.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Because there are significantly more over the age of more youthful adults within buddygays coupon decide to try, a diagnosis is conducted to check the relationship ranging from generation and you will knowledge feeling. As a whole, forty people (33%, letter = ) enhanced one or more grade following training. Proportionally, far more fifty–59 12 months olds (45%, n = ) as compared to other a long time increased a minumum of one amounts just after the training (20%, letter = 1/5, below 31; 0%, n = 0/step 3, 30–39 year olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–44 year olds; and you can twenty-four%, n = 8/33, 60+ seasons olds). To look at whether or not that it pattern was mathematically high, an effective ? dos sample off versatility was computed because of the researching age classification and you can if a person knowledgeable pride phase continuing growth of that or even more level adopting the input (or not).
An analysis was also held to test the connection anywhere between participant intercourse and you will training impact. Even if proportionally, a lot more lady (36%, n = ) than just guys (18%, n = 4/22) advanced a minumum of one stages pursuing the training, a beneficial ? 2 test off liberty found zero relationship ranging from gender and you can ego creativity.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.